Latest Comments

• Hawking: 'There is no heaven'

  Mon May 16, 2011
  • In theory only, no proof. Only his opinion. Dr. Hawking never gives any irrefutable evidence that his theories are correct. There are planty of differing scientific opinions about the origin of the universe.Also please look up the meaning of sarcasm.

• Hawking: 'There is no heaven'

  Mon May 16, 2011
  • Why are we putting so much stock into what Dr. Hawking thinks on a subject in which he is not an expert? Let Dr. Hawking believe what he wants. He has said similarly inciteful things before as if they are fact, not his own personal theories.

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Khairn Please read my reply to Ivanho75 above. Original sin is part of us from the moment of conception, not when we leave the womb.

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Ivanho75 Can't stay on forever, so I will make it brief. "100% of aborted fetuses will go to Heaven, unequivocally." As a catholic I believe that no one short of Jesus and Mary was born without sin. There is no "foolproof" way into heaven except earning it.

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Dave The question was "If they ARE going to be destroyed, do you purport to have a principled argument why they shouldn't be used for possible lifesaving and, if so, what is that argument?" and I had previously posted (the one I assume that you replied to)

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Jon-Garrett "Im a Christian. I love my God and Christ almighty. with that said., let me tell you what people like you believe in.

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Ivanho75 - I have more than just a little problem with your conclusion. Abortion does not save the life of the embryo/fetus (although it may in a few cases save the life of the mother). You also have a very pessimistic view of people.

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Dave please reread the post. We believe that life begins at conception (fertilization). That means that purposely not allowing the embryo to come to be born is the taking of a life. Do I need to go further?

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Chad - It's an interesting set of possibilities, but where is the moral delimma? We are talking about life here and not souls. I don't know when someone becomes "ensouled" or how that works.

• Court backs funding embryonic stem cells

  Fri Apr 29, 2011
  • Pardon my fat fingers. ASC should read ESC.